Outcry Over Calls to Dissolve Parliament, Sahroni Responds with Sharp Rebuke

Source: detik.com

www.jejaknesia.com - Imagine a stage where the curtain of history slowly rises. The spotlight reflects on the face of a public representative, Ahmad Sahroni. He stands calmly, yet with strength. Across the aisle, a storm of criticism hits—the discourse to dissolve the DPR resonates on social media, fueled by public unrest over soaring allowance figures.

Public Unrest and Calls to Dissolve the DPR

This issue did not arise spontaneously. The narrative regarding DPR members' salaries and allowances—reported to reach tens to hundreds of millions of rupiah per month—ignites public emotion. Waves of “dissolve the DPR” calls sweep the timelines, triggered by dissatisfaction with elected officials. VOI notes that the intensity of public reaction was even fueled by the re-emergence of a video of the Presidential Decree by Gus Dur, which once shook the parliament in the past. However, constitutional law experts argue that dissolving the DPR is not a solution; instead, reforming the institution through political parties is a more sovereign and realistic approach.

Firm Warning from Ahmad Sahroni

Amid the overwhelming calls, Ahmad Sahroni spoke firmly. He believes the idea of dissolving the DPR is not only misguided but reflects a “foolish mindset” that harms constructive criticism. Criticism is indeed a part of democracy—anger, censure, protest, all are part of the dynamic between the people and their representatives. However, according to Sahroni, there is an ethics that must be maintained so that criticism does not blunt collective rationality.

Criticism Without Ethics Harms Collective Mentality

“The public may criticize, complain, and even scold... but there are customary norms that must be conveyed,” Sahroni said. He inserted a warning that excessive cursing not only targets the DPR but also undermines collective mental health.

The DPR: An Irreplaceable Pillar of Democracy

Sahroni also reminded that the DPR is not an obstacle in the system—it is an essential part of the check and balance mechanism in democratic governance. Without it, the governmental process could lose legitimacy and balance.

The Melody of History: Soekarno, Gus Dur, and Political Legacy

Then, the historical flashback unfolds. Sahroni points out that the idea of dissolving parliament is not a historical monument—Soekarno once used the July 5, 1959 Decree to dissolve the Indonesian Constituent Assembly and form the DPR-GR. In 2001, Gus Dur issued a similar decree, but it was opposed and led to a special session and his impeachment. These two reflections show that the path of power is not always linear, and extreme decisions often bring heavy political consequences.Conclusion: Criticism with Awareness — and Hope for Change

With a firm yet humane voice, Sahroni closes this stage of criticism: we all, both representatives and citizens, need space for improvement, not destruction. Criticism is important, but it should not become part of breaking mutual respect and the desire to build together.

True democracy is not about tearing down institutions but improving them from within, with empathy, dialogue, and integrity. The idea of “dissolve the DPR” may reflect disappointment, but reform is the continuous path that remains the noblest way.

Closing: Thank you for following this story on the political stage. May the criticism that arises always serve as a motivation to improve governance for the benefit of the people, not merely for personal interests.

Reference Sources

• EraNasional / BeritaSatu 
• Detik.com 
• RMOLSumut.id
• VOI.id