The Lingering Divorce Drama between Pratama Arhan and Azizah Salsha

Source: mpnindonesia.com

www.jejaknesia.com - The divorce between Pratama Arhan and Azizah Salsha attracted public attention after the Tigaraksa Religious Court in Tangerang issued a default divorce ruling. This process marked the end of their marriage, which had previously been in the public spotlight. The following is an explanation of the case journey and the legal meaning of a default divorce.

1. Controversies in the Marriage

Throughout their marriage, the public frequently observed various issues surrounding this couple’s household. Azizah Salsha was often in the spotlight, both in terms of personal life dynamics and news coverage regarding the state of their marriage. Public attention on the couple increased as news of the divorce petition emerged.

2. Court Proceedings and Default Ruling

On August 1, 2025, Pratama Arhan officially filed a divorce petition with the Tigaraksa Religious Court in Tangerang. The first hearing was held on August 11, but Azizah Salsha did not appear. Her absence repeated at the second hearing on August 25. Under these circumstances, the panel of judges ultimately issued a default divorce ruling, meaning the divorce was granted without the defendant’s presence despite being properly summoned.

3. Understanding the Meaning of Default Divorce

Legally, a default divorce is a divorce decision issued by the court when the defendant does not appear at the hearing even though they were formally and properly summoned. In this case, Pratama Arhan appeared as the plaintiff, while Azizah did not attend the hearings without an acceptable reason. Therefore, the judge is authorized to decide the case based on the available evidence and documents.

Requirements for a valid default divorce:

• The petition must be officially filed with the Religious Court according to legal regulations.
• The defendant must be properly summoned more than once.
• The defendant does not appear without a clear reason, allowing the hearing to proceed.

After the ruling is read, there is a 14-day period for the defendant to file a legal objection, known as verzet, or to appeal. If no objection is made, the default ruling becomes legally binding.

4. Legal and Social Perspectives

This case not only demonstrates the legal procedural process but also provides insight into the social dynamics of a divorce. From a legal perspective, the default ruling reflects the efficiency of the court process when one party does not appear. From a social perspective, it highlights how the public pays close attention to the private lives of public figures.

Legal and Social Significance

From a legal standpoint, this ruling is part of the established judicial mechanism. Socially, divorces involving public figures often spark wide discussions in society, concerning both personal aspects and the potential impact on their social lives in the future.

Regardless of the dynamics involved, the court ruling marks the conclusion of the legal journey between Pratama Arhan and Azizah Salsha. Moving forward, it is hoped that both parties can continue their individual lives positively.

References